January 30, 2007
-
The country’s most influential newspaper has weighed in on the mixed message of the wolf delisting. Mixed News for Wolves
-
The Democrats have held their first of undoubtedly many oversight hearings on how the Bush Administration is, well, administering the laws. This is a basic role of Congress that was suppressed during the last 6 years of Republican congressional rule (the minority party in Congress can’t call hearings). Story in New York Times (you can…
-
Technically there aren’t any wolves in Utah, although there really are probably a few in northern Utah. Nevertheless, Northern Utah was included in the Northern Rockies wolf delisting. So was Eastern Oregon and Eastern Washington. All these places would highly likely to see wolf in-migration. I can see only one reason for this — it’s…
-
Story in the Caspter Star Tribune by Whitney Royster. Note that “altering elk hunting” is not the same as reducing the number of elk. This article takes pains to stress that. A lot of the complaint from some elk hunters is that they have to adapt to new conditions, and learning new techniques of hunting…
-
Plan to delist wolves still faces obstacles. Legal challenges could delay federal proposalto give control to Idaho and Montana by year’s end. By Rocky Barker – Idaho Statesman. Here the story as told by Idaho’s largest newspaper
-
Wisconsin Ag News Headlines. Rural Groups React Positively to Removing Wolf Protections What an informative article. It says “rural groups” and then speaks of the Safari Club and the Bear Association. Only the Wisconsin Cattlemen’s Association seems rural to me. It tells us that the wolf herd in Wisconsin is 500 animals. Wolf “herd?” It…
-
Here is a good article on the dieoff of whitebark pine and grizzly bears. In the Rockies, Pines Die and Bears Feel It. New York Times. By Charles Petit.