Conservation Transfer Program Degrades Wild Bison

Bison bull in Yellowstone NP, WY. Photo George Wuerthner.

A recent article in the Bozeman Chronicle described the Yellowstone “Bison Conservation” Transfer Program.

Bison at sunset. Yellowstone NP, WY. Photo George Wuerthner

The federal government is transferring public bison that belong to all Americans to tribal reservations, which is essentially a privatization of public wildlife. In the process, they are accelerating the domestication of wild bison from Yellowstone National Park.

Bison calves and cows. Yellowstone NP, WY. Photo George Wuerthner

Restoration and conservation of wild bison involve preserving ecological and evolutionary processes that have shaped bison for millions of years. By contrast, confining animals to fenced pastures, killing predators, winter feeding, selective breeding and other measures typical of livestock production destroy wild bison.

Tribal hunters gutting bison shot on Gallatin NF by Gardiner Montana. Photo George Wuerthner

The transfer to tribes may seem like a better outcome than slaughter (tribes killed 1707 bison) by the same tribes at the border of Yellowstone. To see how “sacred” tribal hunting is, go here.

Part of the tribal carnage by Gardiner, Montana. How tribes celebrate and show respect for “brother bison.”

However, the entire program is analogous to suggesting that hatcheries contribute to the survival of wild fish. As any fish biologist knows, hatchery fish are genetically inferior to wild fish.

According to the article, the money will pay for fencing, water development, and other infrastructure to continue domesticating our wild bison.

Wild bison are subject to evolutionary selective factors like ability to survive harsh winter weather. Photo George Wuerthner


Wild bison are subject to evolutionary selective factors such as predation, mate competition, forage and water availability, disease, and severe weather. These selective factors determine an individual’s fitness and which individuals are best adapted to their environment.

Heads of bison in pick up truck killed by tribal hunters by Gardiner, Montana. Photo George Wuerthner

The annual slaughter of bison by tribal members and other hunters is part of the ongoing degradation of the wild bison genome.

Migration is one of the evolutionary features that permitted bison to survive for thousands of years. Migration is destroyed when hunters kill the bison or when they are rounded up for “transfer” to a reservation. In either case, it is a degradation of bison survival mechanisms–a domestication of wild bison. Photo George Wuerthner

Wild bison have several survival mechanisms. One is migration. Another is the ability to sustain themselves on native vegetation even in winter. The cultural context of herd family groups is one way that cultural knowledge of where to find food or evade predators is part of their persistence strategy. Standing united against predators like wolves is a survival mechanism that has worked for thousands of years.

Coyotes feeding on a dead bison. When Yellowstone bison are removed from the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, it impacts the other wildlife that depend on bison as prey. Tribal hunters and bison transfer is taking food out of the mouths of wolves, bears, coyotes, and numerous other wildlife. Photo George Wuerthner


Slaughter or transfer by humans
removes bison from their grazing influence on the landscape and reduces prey availability for wolves, bears, and other wildlife.
Indian hunting on the border of Yellowstone eliminates all these traits and others.

The bison most likely to migrate are the first to be eliminated from the herd. Tribal hunting destroys the social context of family groups. The survival strategy of standing to defend the herd doesn’t work against humans with “traditional ecological knowledge” and high-powered rifles.

It’s important to note that tribal hunters exterminated bison from much of the West after they obtained the horse and gun. By 1860, bison had been extirpated over half of their former 1800 range.


Furthermore, on many reservations, the Yellowstone bison are slaughtered, often for a price by non-Indians. The Blackfeet, Fort Peak, and other reservations will sell you a license to kill the very bison they obtained free from Yellowstone.


Whether killed on the reservations or further domesticated by placing them on small enclosed parcels of land on the reservations, subject to selective breeding and other practices associated with domestic cattle, the end is the same- more significant loss of the wildness of Yellowstone’s bison.


This is the greatest insult to these wild creatures.

Bison cow and calf. The family bond is an important “cultural” feature of bison herds that is part of their survival strategy. Indiscriminate slaughter degrades these bonds. Photo George Wuerthner


Yellowstone’s herd is of international biological importance as one of the least domesticated bison in the West, yet we treat them as so much meat on the hoof instead of the wild beings that have evolved since “time immemorial.” Just remember, the bison has been here for millions of years longer than the humans that colonized North America. If any entity deserves special treatment, it is Yellowstone’s bison.

Bison grazing in Yellowstone Park near Gardiner, Montana. Photo George Wuerthner


One of the biggest obstacles to preserving wild bison is the state of Montana’s refusal to recognize the importance of restoring wild bison on public lands outside Yellowstone. The state cannot legally stop the federal government (due to the Supremacy Clause) from permitting bison to colonize the Custer Gallatin National Forest or transfer to the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge.

Missouri River in Charles M. Russell NWR. Montana. Photo George Wuerthner

Tribal slaughter or transfer of Yellowstone’s bison is essentially doing the bidding of the livestock industry. If there were no tribal involvement, the state would have to slaughter thousands of bison themselves, and one can only imagine how this would play with the general public. So, in essence, the tribes are the fall guys for the ranchers.


However, instead of confronting the state, the federal government avoided controversy by involving the tribes in destroying bison wildness.


Unfortunately, most of the “so-called” conservation groups in Montana, like the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, Sierra Club, Buffalo Field Campaign and numerous other organizations, support tribal slaughter and domestication.

The eastern extent of the Nez Perce ceded territory is the Idaho-Montana border and nowhere near Yellowstone. Yet the tribe claims it has “treaty rights” to kill Yellowstone Bison.

One inaccurate statement in the article is the questionable assertion that tribes have “treaty rights” to kill Yellowstone bison. Read the treaties. No tribes have ceded lands west of the Yellowstone River by Gardiner or treaty rights from the 1855 Lame Bull Treaty, which had a 99-year extinguishment clause and ended treaty rights in the area in 1954.

Bison in Yellowstone NP. Photo George Wuerthner


I have nothing against tribal bison herds, but there are numerous other sources of bison other than removing wild bison from the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

To ensure sufficient genetic diversity, we need at least 10,000 or more bison spread across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Photo George Wuerthner

To learn more about wild bison and organizations seeking to preserve them, visit the Montana Wild Bison Restoration Coalition, Roam Free Nation, Yellowstone Voices, or Alliance for Rockies.


Bio: George Wuerthner is an ecologist and wild bison advocate. He is the board president of the Montana Wild Bison Restoration Coalition.

Comments

  1. Anotherview Avatar
    Anotherview

    I have mixed feelings about the points being made here.

    On the one hand, I believe the YNP bison should be free to roam, and recognize the constant culling diminishes the chances that critical masses are present to allow that to happen.

    On the other hand, I think the tribes are honestly interested in repatriating wild bison to their reservations to allow them to live wild lives, while enabling some level of food sovereignty and ability to sustain cultural practices. Do they really deserve “genetically inferior bison” for that purpose?

    With a longer view, eventually there will be fewer places able to take them, but hopefully more options for them to roam public lands, such as the Charles M Russell and adjoining American Prairie/ Fort Belknap Reservation complex.

    1. Ida Lupine Avatar
      Ida Lupine

      I have to ask, does it even matter for that purpose – killing for food? Why do they have to have the last of the genetically distinct Yellowstone bison? The tribes do not own the bison any more than the colonialists did! I’m not entirely convinced either that in general Native people are interested in ‘repatriating’ the bison, or if cultural practices in the modern age can ever be what they were.

      It is my understanding that all all of the bison of Yellowstone descend from a very small gene pool. Today, all people should be concerned with their protection, so we don’t go down that heinous road of the 1800s again. We cannot naively recreate the past anymore.

  2. Ed Loosli Avatar
    Ed Loosli

    Thanks again George, ,, There are over 7.000.000 acres of Federal Public Lands (mostly US Forest Service and some BLM), totally surrounding the relatively small Yellowstone Nat. Park (only 2,000,000 acres). The Feds should stop letting the states surrounding Yellowstone NP prevent the Greater Yellowstone Bison from ROAMING FREE on all of our PUBLIC LANDS outside Yellowstone N.P. … It is pathetic and embarassing that the U.S. Dept. of Interior and the U.S. Forest Service are actually being run by the Livestock Departments from the States of Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. … Why hasn’t any bison friendly groupl takent the Feds to court over their illegal handing over Bison authority on FEDERAL LANDS to these three state governments??

  3. Jon Way Avatar
    Jon Way

    I totally agree with your points Ed, thanks!

  4. ChicoRey Avatar
    ChicoRey

    It continues to make clear the lack of any actual research by these agencies – in regard to herd animals. I realize the Wild Horse issue is a difficult one for some people – BUT the herd and elder issues are the same. Possibly thats true for other herd animals. Its the same issue for packs of wolves – removing or slaughtering the animals that are responsible for teaching the young how to hunt – where to hunt, etc. does damage to the entire pack or herd. Humans continue to either not understand, possibly not to care because its to their advantage!
    I agree with Ed regarding taking Feds AND STATES to Court! WHE, a Wild Horse Organization does that regularly – do they win – yes, sometimes but as deeply set as the anti-Wild Horse, PRO-livestock/mining mindset is – its tough to make headway.
    So maybe make waves – big ones!!!

    1. Ida Lupine Avatar
      Ida Lupine

      We have made serious, yes stupid, mistakes with hugely far-reaching effect in the past that cannot be fixed entirely today – for both people and wildlife.

      It is my sincere hope that the Native tribes do take this responsibility seriously, but once these animals are under private control, there is no guarantee.

  5. Fred Koontz Avatar
    Fred Koontz

    Most “wildlife management” in the U.S is more similar to agriculture than wildlife conservation. It is not surprising, therefore, that when viewed as meat they are domesticated for production and slaughtered based on efficiency rather than some sort of fabled “fair chase.” In the case of the bison, the issue is further entangled in misplaced identity politics and a liberal, guilt-driven belief in mythologies of Indigenous life and ethics. In many Indigenous and western cultures, moral consideration to the land (ecosystem) is not automatically equivalent to their moral consideration of individual animals. It is especially ironic (sad) that the bison has been designated by Congress as our “national mammal.”

  6. Ida Lupine Avatar
    Ida Lupine

    Let me clarify what I posted above – the important thing today for our nearly destroyed wildlife populations, the bison in this case, is that they be protected and preserved. Not who gets to kill them!!!!!

    Apparently we have leaned nothing. Everything else for human needs constantly first, is now secondary in my opinion.

  7. Ida Lupine Avatar
    Ida Lupine

    I should add that when I visited Yellowstone for the first time, and saw the wild bison, they are among the most awe-inspiring and beautiful of our unique prairie ecosystem. And I will repeat – no one owns them or has rights to them!

    https://www.nationalparkstraveler.org/2025/01/montana-files-new-years-eve-lawsuit-over-yellowstone-bison-plan

    Montana needs to be sued right back. I wish they’d get that big lie of brucellosis threat done with too.

Leave a Reply

Author

George Wuerthner is an ecologist and writer who has published 38 books on various topics related to environmental and natural history. He has visited over 400 designated wilderness areas and over 200 national park units.

Subscribe to get new posts right in your Inbox

×