Gianforte’s Lawsuit Against Yellowstone is a Crybaby Move

Let’s be clear: Gianforte’s lawsuit doesn’t represent Montanans, but rather Montana livestock interests. The vast majority of Montanans want wild, migratory buffalo restored in our state.

The brucellosis boogey-man argument is old and is full of holes. The disease was brought to North America through invasive cattle. Brucellosis entered the Yellowstone buffalo herds by erroneous human actions. There has never been a documented case of wild buffalo transmitting brucellosis to livestock, even prior to the expired Interagency Bison Management Plan. Montana livestock interests even oppose quarantine, which, while a domestication process, produces brucellosis-free buffalo. Elk have been implicated dozens of times in transmitting brucellosis to livestock, yet are free to roam. This issue has never been about brucellosis. It is a centuries-old range war about the grass and who gets to eat it.

How, exactly, was Montana left out of Yellowstone’s new bison management plan planning process?  They had every opportunity to submit comments and attend a webinar beginning in January 2022. They regularly meet with Yellowstone officials as well as other Interagency Bison Management Plan cohorts. In fact, Gianforte’s feedback to Yellowstone during the planning process grossly altered the Draft Environmental Impact Statement as well as the Final EIS and Record of Decision. Yellowstone had suggested a much higher population in Alternative 3 during the scoping phase, but due to Gianforte’s threats, the park significantly reduced target population numbers. Gianforte and Yellowstone have ignored public opinion. More than 75% of people who commented chose Alternative 3, but Gianforte threatened to sue Yellowstone, so the park not only reduced population objectives, but chose Alternative 2. I’d call that input that was caved to.

Roam Free Nation doesn’t much care for the new bison management plan either, but for completely opposite reasons than Gianforte and his livestock cronies.

And why should Gianforte care if the population increases? Nearly every single buffalo who migrates into Montana is gunned down by state and treaty hunters. The Montana Dept. of Livestock has barely lifted a finger in over a decade. Now they have mainly tribes doing their dirty work, using treaties to facilitate the destruction of the last wild buffalo.

Gianforte’s complaint repeatedly states that Yellowstone’s buffalo population is too high, even at lower numbers than what the new plan calls for, which is scientifically unsound. The fact is, Yellowstone’s senior bison biologist, Chris Geremia, publicly stated that Yellowstone alone can sustain upwards of 11,000 buffalo. Gianforte’s complaint also suggests that the buffalo are “harming” habitat in the park, which is also scientifically inaccurate. Yellowstone’s former senior bison biologist, Rick Wallen, has stated that the buffalo don’t even use all the available habitat within the park, and that they create and manage their own habitat — which they have done for hundreds of thousands of years. It’s what they do. Wild, migratory buffalo are the true stewards of grasslands and prairies.

Yellowstone’s plan is bad enough, caving to livestock interests, domestication, and “hunting”, but Gianforte’s lawsuit could impose heavier, more serious setbacks with dire consequences. The Yellowstone population is ecologically extinct throughout their native range, wild bison are “red listed” by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature as “near threatened”. MT Fish, Wildlife & Parks — shockingly a plaintiff on the suit — classifies buffalo as a Tier 1 species, “one in greatest conservation need.” The Montana Heritage Program and MFWP have listed bison as a species of concern, considered to be at risk. The Yellowstone herds are being considered for Endangered Species Act protection by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.

Wild bison advocates have gotten too soft on Montana’s livestock interests. Given Gianforte’s crybaby actions, it’s time to put them back in the hot seat.  

Stephany Seay is the cofounder of the Montana-based and native-lead Roam Free Nation. More information can be found at RoamFreeNation.org.


Posted

in

, , ,

by

Comments

  1. Makuye Avatar
    Makuye

    I noticed consistently where bison and cattle have shared grazing space, that bison remain significant distance.
    And in an area where elk and cattle cohabit, the elk seem to disperse even among bos.
    (Humans, of course, fail to retain reasonable distances from even themselves, so our long history of communicable disease, from STDs to pulmonary and parasites, should be understood as a lack of intelligence and cognitive capacity.
    We, too are a herd animal, with a brain evolved to focus solipsistically upon ourselves.
    Gianforte has pleasure-killed the native wolf, including ones seasonally necessarily departing the Yellowstone Plateau. )

  2. Michael G Sauber Avatar
    Michael G Sauber

    I really like the use of the term “crybaby”. It will create an image in the minds of all who read this. Reframing the debate from those sick inducing bison to the pathetic attempt to kill off more native animals. Good work.

  3. lou Avatar
    lou

    I suggest that Montana voters stop putting people like Gianforte in office if they disagree with his actions. Blame this on them. Just like the recent presidential election. Rogue politicians are a constant threat, but we don’t have to vote for them. They don’t get into office by themselves.

    1. ChicoRey Avatar
      ChicoRey

      So – when is Gianforte’s term over with? Is there an actual possibility that someone who really cares about buffalo and other wildlife would have a chance to get voted in?
      Having read of his “hunting” prowess – shooting a treed mountain lion & a trapped(?) wolf – I imagine those are only the ones known about. After his shoving a reporter rather than answer a question – my impression of this very little man is not a good one.
      I hope for wildlife’s sake – hes gone soon!

  4. BR Andrews Avatar
    BR Andrews

    On the large ranch where I lived and worked in northern Nevada in the 1980s, we vaccinated the cattle against brucellosis. The RB51 vaccine is 70–80% effective. While not perfect, it has been instrumental in reducing the prevalence of the disease.

    Brucellosis was most likely introduced to the United States through imported livestock. In the Midwest, where concentrated farming was (and still is) common, outbreaks occurred. Open-range grazing and the movement of cattle herds across the West further facilitated the spread of brucellosis among ranching communities. The disease eventually spilled over into wildlife populations.

    The livestock industry has no one to blame for this issue but itself. With vaccinations available, what’s all the whining about? Vaccinate the cattle and move on.

    However, the most telling statement in your article is: “This issue has never been about brucellosis. It is a centuries-old range war about the grass and who gets to eat it.” The livestock industry wants the land—including our publicly owned lands—for themselves and their profit. Yet western ranchers contribute less than 3–5% of the total beef production in the U.S., an insignificant contribution.

  5. BR Andrews Avatar
    BR Andrews

    On the large ranch where I lived and worked in northern Nevada in the 1980s, we vaccinated the cattle against brucellosis. The RB51 vaccine is 70–80% effective. While not perfect, it has been instrumental in reducing the prevalence of the disease.

    Brucellosis was most likely introduced to the United States through imported livestock. In the Midwest, where concentrated farming was (and still is) common, outbreaks occurred. Open-range grazing and the movement of cattle herds across the West further facilitated the spread of brucellosis among ranching communities. The disease eventually spilled over into wildlife populations.

    The livestock industry has no one to blame for this issue but itself. With vaccinations available, what’s all the whining about? Vaccinate the cattle and move on.

    However, the most telling statement in this discussion is: “This issue has never been about brucellosis. It is a centuries-old range war about the grass and who gets to eat it.” The livestock industry wants the land—including our publicly owned lands—for themselves and their profit. Yet western ranchers contribute less than 3–5% of the total beef production in the U.S., an insignificant contribution.

  6. Eric Smith Avatar
    Eric Smith

    This webpage from Buffalo Field Campaign has some excellent info regarding the lack of infection from buffalo to cattle of brucellosis.

    https://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org/yellowstone-bison-and-brucellosis-persistent-mythology

    I also think that many of the points in the BFC webpage easily put to the lie the motivation and concerns of Montana and its Livestock Industry. This industry captured western governments long ago to do their bidding, and they will lie, cheat, and steal in any way possible to keep their cattle roaming across every last inch of the arid west. There are so many examples of how they have twisted and warped the West and its ecosystems to meet their greedy needs. Be it Buffalo (native) confined to YNP or Wolves (native) slaughtered with no evidence of predation or Elk (native) that are confined to feeding grounds in the winter to pass CWD between themselves, all in the name of making the “range” and forage available to their non-native hooved locusts. It is time to kick them off all public lands, including all BLM and USFS lands.

Leave a Reply

Author

Stephany Seay has been working in service to the last wild buffalo for over 20 years. Born in the Outer Banks of North Carolina and raised in Virginia, Stephany learned about the continued war against wild buffalo in 1996 and has been advocating for them ever since. In response to their struggle, she moved to Montana on New Year’s Day 2004, where she became the media coordinator for Buffalo Field Campaign, with whom she parted ways after 18 years of service over philosophical differences. Stephany has nearly 20 years of experience standing with the buffalo, is an avid wildlife photographer, backcountry skier, and horsewoman. She is a member of Deep Green Resistance, and co-founder of Roam Free Nation.

Stephany trusts that the buffalo have called us not just to help defend them, but to help us save us from ourselves from the unsustainable and selfish creation of industrial civilization.

Subscribe to get new posts right in your Inbox

×