A Newly Surfaced Document Reveals the Beef Industry’s Secret Climate Plan

What the beef industry knew about its environmental impact — and how it spent decades blocking climate action.

Immediately following yesterday’s article on the BS Myth that ‘grass-fed’ beef is better, Vox published an article about the livestock industry’s four-decade-long effort to hide the massive impacts of livestock production.

You can read the entire article here.

The industry’s “strategic plan” can be downloaded here.

Nearly every acre of our public lands, that is not rock or ice, (even some of our National Parks) is devoted to livestock production and that has massive impacts on virtually every aspect of ecosystem function: Increasing soil erosion, reducing carbon storage, reducing primary production, destroying biological soil crust, destroying fisheries and riparian habitat, destroying wildlife habitat, fences, predator killing, etc. (and nearly all of this is paid for by our tax dollars.

Do you know why they bury ranchers only 2 feet deep…..So they can keep their hand out.

Below is a chart of vegetative conditions on a wide range of BLM Field Offices across the west.

Poor = 0-25% of potential

Fair = 26-50% of potential

Good = 51-75% of potential

HCPC = Historic Climax Plant Community 76-100% of potential

Most of the Field Offices have about 80% of their lands at below 50% of potential.

For those who have been duped by the savory BS, the arid west, prior to the European invasion, had no significant population density of large herbivores. The massive herds of bison people imagine were restricted to the Great Plains (where it rains). Check out the seminal Mack and Thompson. Or RMRS-GRT-169.

Researchers (not TED Talk hucksters) have carefully examined the savory BS and found it vacuous. Here are some of the top range scientist’s examinations here and here. I was a co-author on a review of the savory BS Holistic Management: Misinformation on the Science of Grazed Ecosystems

While cattle production is certainly the worst possible way to produce food and has, by far, the largest impact on our public lands, the issue goes way beyond just cattle.

Sure, raising chickens uses less land and produces less GHG’s but look at the issue of bird flu. When you raise chickens by the billions, you create the perfect incubator for various diseases, that at some point will jump to other species, like us.

The bottom line is that, back in the era when there were maybe 200 million humans on the planet, we could get away with eating animals, but now as we rapidly approach 8,500,000,000 we can’t.

I am sure this will generate lots of complaints from people who want to throw up excuses to cover for the fact they don’t want to make simple behavioral changes that will not only greatly benefit their own health and longevity, but the planet’s as well.

Comments

  1. Maggie Avatar
    Maggie

    Anyone – with a lick of common sense – should be aware of the absolute devastation we humans are doing to this planet. And yes, few “want” to change or adjust their lifestyles – no matter which rung of the ladder they exist upon. We (humans) “need” and want what we want – period.
    The grazing allotment “program” costs each and every taxpayer so that the livestock industry can get their subsidies. And whether its mining, lumber, or any other extractive and money-making industry, its the same.
    Good article – now I’m going back & reading about the Savory BS.

  2. Bruce Bowen Avatar
    Bruce Bowen

    Beer battered grasshoppers and jellyfish steaks are looking better and better.

    One problem for sure is that it is so hard to get the fundamentals of ecology into the popular narrative in today’s media. David Suzuki’s “The Nature of Things” was good but was never taken very seriously. The business mind will not go there. Ecology is a forbidden subject and talking about carrying capacity will get you thrown into the same bucket as an evil cartoon character.

  3. Ida Lupine Avatar
    Ida Lupine

    “The bottom line is that, back in the era when there were maybe 200 million humans on the planet, we could get away with eating animals, but now as we rapidly approach 8,500,000,000 we can’t.”

    You can repeat this over and over and nobody wants to get it. They just want to think they can continue on as we always have, those who even think about it at all!

    Today, we think we are returning to a grand old Industrialist’s Age, I fear. (which wasn’t so grand).

Leave a Reply

Author
Jonathan Ratner

Jonathan Ratner has been in the trenches of public lands conservation for nearly 25 years. He started out doing forest carnivore work for the Forest Service, BLM, and the Inter-agency Grizzly Bear Study Team, with some Wilderness Rangering on the Pinedale Ranger District. That work lead him directly to deal with the gross corruption within the federal agencies' range program.

Subscribe to get new posts right in your Inbox

×